On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:32:46PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > >Because ltdl.h already states that libltdl relies on a featureful > >realloc, let's just set lt_dlrealloc = realloc and test for a > >featureful realloc in ltdl.m4. Let's recommend that if anyone changes > >at least one of lt_dlmalloc, lt_dlrealloc, or lt_dlfree, then they > >should also change them all. Let the client worry about malloc/free > >and ltdl be somewhat stupid to the choices of the client. > > what is any of this for in the first place?
You mean why do we allos someone to define lt_dlmalloc, lt_dlrealloc, and lt_dlfree? I don't know :) -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
