On May 20, 2001, Sander Vesik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you don't then even need to care about indirect depenencies. I wish... > Or are there broken ld.so-s that wouldn't support this? Think static libraries, for one. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
- Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_libs Martin Baulig
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_li... Havoc Pennington
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_li... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_li... Martin Baulig
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_li... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_li... Martin Baulig
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependenc... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_li... Sander Vesik
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_li... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependency_li... Sander Vesik
- Re: Removing duplicate occurences from dependenc... Alexandre Oliva