On Tuesday 15 May 2001 3:59 am, Bruce Korb wrote:
> 1. make a change that accomplishes a small goal:
> o fixes a bug
> o unifies common code into global macros
> o moves towards a real program (as opposed to a shell
> script emitter wrapped around the shell script).
>
> 2. emit ltmain.in and verify that either the program will behave
> identically to before, or the bug is fixed.
>
> 3. check in the generated ltmain.in into the main line
>
> 4. Repeat until done.
>
> That means that each step #1 should be small and safe.
> Thoughts? :-)
Agreed.
The tricky part will be flushing the patch queue when your code is still on a
branch, since you will likely have to port HEAD patchs into binary-branch so
that the eventual merge is not too bad...
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())____
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
