Ossama Othman wrote: > > Hi, > > Since many of you are using the libtool multi-language branch, I > wanted to check with you about switching that branch to use CVS > autoconf and CVS automake. I have some patches ready for approval > (i.e. I haven't submitted them for approval yet), but if there is too > much opposition to such a move then I may rethink the switch. Does > anyone have problems with such a change? > It would make _my_ task a lot more difficult as I would have to backport your changes to released versions of auto*. We already keep our own copy of libtool in our CVS, anything else wouldn't work for KDE. Greetings, Stephan -- ... but you ain't had mine
- ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/autoconf? Ossama Othman
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/autocon... Stephan Kulow
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/autocon... Ossama Othman
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/aut... Stephan Kulow
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/autocon... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/autocon... Mo DeJong
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/aut... Ossama Othman
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/aut... Lars J. Aas
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/autocon... Ossama Othman
- Re: ML branch: okay to switch to CVS automake/aut... Alexandre Oliva