Hi Kevin,
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:37:59PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2000, Ossama Othman wrote:
> > goes through. This means that libtool should be dropping the static
> > libs from the dependency list. Do you get a warning message from
> > Libtool such as:
>
> None: This is what I get
>
> rac10:~/test: ./configure --enable-shared --disable-static
> creating cache ./config.cache
[snip]
> mkdir .libs
> c++ -DPACKAGE=\"test\" -DVERSION=\"1.0\" -I. -I. -g -O2 -c test.cc
> -Wp,-MD,.deps/test.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/test.o
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link c++ -g -O2 -o libtest.la -rpath
> /usr/local/lib test.lo
[snip]
> _IO_do_write 0x154
> /usr/local/gnu/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.6/2.95.1/libstdc++.a(filebuf.o)
> ....
>
> ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable
> sections
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> *** Error code 1
> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `libtest.la'
>
> This is using the latest libtool ml checked out at arounf 5:00 PM EST.
*sigh* :-(
Okay, that's certainly busted. I'll dive into the code again. Thanks
for the feedback Kevin!
> I am using a CVS Version of Autoconf and automake not sure of the last
> checkout data but it was within a month.
AFAIK, this shouldn't be a problem.
-Ossama
--
Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068 70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8
