Hi Kevin,

On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 08:10:37AM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2000, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > I think it's ML specific as it explicitly adds libstdc++.a. HEAD branch
> > checks
> > for -lstdc++ if it's static and drops it from the linker call
> 
> Unless I am mistaken the non ML branch simple does not include -lstdc++ AT
> ALL when making C++ libraries, thus libstdc++ being static is not a
> problem.  In fact I believe the non ML branch does not do anything special
> when creating C++ libraries.

Right!

> It only known to call c++ when compiling and
> linking executables.

I don't even think it does that (does it?).  From what I recall, it
just uses the linker when creating C++ libraries, which is incorrect.
The ML branch was initially created to address this issue, i.e. make
libtool not so C library specific.

> This feature was discussed in previous emails at length...

I guess that I need to run through the archives again.  :-)

-Ossama
-- 
Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068  70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8

Reply via email to