On Mar 29, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What will be next - 1.4 made from MAIN CVS? And next - 1.5 from ML
> CVS?
Yup
> Anyway, if I'm interested in developing libtool, am I suggested to
> look, or maybe even base, on ML branch?
We're trying to get the CVS HEAD stable enough for a release, which
means any major development should be done in the ML branch.
> That's nice. What I'd like to do now is try to make up-to-seamless
> support for win32 dlls. I'm glad to know that there's no problem
> with using gcc to link on *that platform*.
I'm sure Gary will tell you how impossible that is to achieve, because
of the brain-damaged way in which DLLs were designed on MS-Windows.
At least, I think I've already convinced him of that. :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
