(now with my correct From: address, sorry)
Hi Daniel,
(I'm not a libtool maintainer, but the author of current --with-aix-soname impl)
On 06/24/2015 03:34 PM, Daniel Ruoso (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX) wrote:
> This patch offers a simplified implementation of a SONAME-like behavior
> emulation.
I've tried this variant of soname-emulation too, but discovered the one using
the "lib.so.v(shr.o,shr.imp)" archive (=svr4) as the more reasonable compromise.
Is there a specific reason you need/want this simplified implementation?
> This is different in the sense that it doesn't add archives disguised as .so
> files,
Yeah, instead it does provide plain text files disguised as .so files.
Besides that, there's potential for more different confusion:
*) Linking with "/path/to/lib.so" produces different result than
linking with "/path/to/lib.so.v" (difference is in the runpath).
*) dlopen("lib.so") fails, while dlopen("lib.so.v") does work.
*) Provides two distinct files, instead of one single file with symlinks.
> and instead relies on the fact that the AIX linker will take an import file
> when
> looking for -l<foo>, and will record what the import file says.
This very detail isn't anything different compared to aix-soname=svr4.
Leaving alone different confusion, this version of the patch has some real
problems:
*) Please post patches as plain-text.
*) Breaks test cases in build setups that should be unaffected by this patch
(I'm using https://github.com/haubi/libtool-testing/ for the different build
setups to run the testsuite in and compare the results).
*) Why do you change archive_expsym_cmds for $host_cpu = ia64 ?
*) Seems you haven't used 'make distcheck': Tells to not use '==' with 'test'.
*) Prohibits the AIX-style of multilib (multiple shared objects in one archive).
*) Existing site setups using LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl will break, as their existing
binaries depend on the unversioned .so files, which will be replaced by
plain text files.
At least something like --with-aix-soname=simple would be necessary.
Thanks for your interest on this topic!
/haubi/
