On 2012-11-13 15:32, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2012-10-18 15:56, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi Eric! >> >> On 2012-10-18 15:02, Eric Blake wrote: >>> [adding-gnulib] >> >> I'm not subscribed, please (continue to) keep me in CC. >> >>> On 10/18/2012 06:50 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I used to use a libtool git checkout from a platform that lacks >>>> git [MSYS], but that broke at some point. I would like something >>>> like the below to unbreak my work flow. >>>> >>>> Please? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am >>>> index 176325c..3bcb419 100644 >>>> --- a/Makefile.am >>>> +++ b/Makefile.am >>>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ EXTRA_LTLIBRARIES = >>>> # Using `cd' in backquotes may print the directory name, use this instead: >>>> lt__cd = CDPATH="$${ZSH_VERSION+.}$(PATH_SEPARATOR)" && cd >>>> >>>> -git_version_gen = '$(SHELL)' '$(aux_dir)/git-version-gen' >>>> '.tarball-version' >>>> +git_version_gen = '$(SHELL)' '$(aux_dir)/git-version-gen' '--fallback' >>>> '$(VERSION)' '.tarball-version' >>> >>> I'm not sure that makes sense - git-version-gen is ALREADY supposed to >>> use the contents of .tarball-version as the fallback version. >> >> No, .tarball-version is the primary source, or the "fallfront" as >> some call it :-) Once you create that file you will no longer >> attempt to run git, even if you switch back to the platform that >> created the git checkout in the first place. > > Ping for these patches: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-10/msg00123.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-10/msg00124.html
Ping again. This seems to be stalled because of a misconception. Can I please get a second opinion? Please? Cheers, Peter