On 2012-09-19 09:31, Peter Rosin wrote: > * tests/runpath-in-lalib.at: Make sure shared libraries are created > on Windows by passing -no-undefined. Otherwise libb.la fails to record > a dependency on liba.la, and the final link of the program then fails > with undefined symbols. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <p...@lysator.liu.se> > --- > tests/runpath-in-lalib.at | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Ok to push? > Or maybe the failure is deeper than this? Should libb.la record a > dependency on liba.la even if libb.la is static only? > > The relevant difference in libb.la with this patch is this (I have > elided changes to dlopen and library_names which are empty when > no shared library is built): > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ > inherited_linker_flags='' > > # Libraries that this one depends upon. > -dependency_libs=' > -R/home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests/testsuite.dir/047/foobar ' > +dependency_libs=' > -R/home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests/testsuite.dir/047/foobar > /home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests/testsuite.dir/047/liba.la' > > # Names of additional weak libraries provided by this library > weak_library_names=''
I likely is deeper, it seems this is a regression since 2.4.2. Cheers, Peter
