Le samedi 09 octobre 2010 à 10:55 +0200, Paolo Bonzini a écrit : > On 10/09/2010 10:51 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:43:12AM CEST: > >> I'm applying this patch since it's pretty obvious. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Is this fixing (part) of the reported bug? > > Lionel pointed us to the patch, so I assumed it fixed all of it. I > still haven't built his stuff. It looks really interesting, as does > OpenEmbedded, and it's really cool that the sysroot feature is already > getting this much exposure. I was worried that it would remain confined > in the "unused feature" limbo and would bitrot. > > It's also nice because it shows that these people _are_ > autoreconfing/relibtoolizing as part of their build systems. It gives > me much more confidence on the backwards-compatibility of libtool 2.4! > > > Do you know how to expose it, so we can cover it in the testsuite? > > Not yet, I'll look into it next week. I need to build Lionel's recipe > and then distill a testcase. > > > For future sysroot patches, feel free to also (or first) commit them to > > the sysroot branch and merge them to master. > > Ok, I was undecided about the status of the sysroot branch. >
Hi, Paolo, I'm sorry if I made you though this patch was fixing my problem (in fact after a quick test, it does not). I just wanted to point it out, because Openembedded like buildroot, are projects which try to crosscompile source packages. I though it might be a good start to investigate the problem. And yes, I personally prefer to autoreconf/libtoolize packages rather than patching a generated libtool script :) Regards, -- Lionel Landwerlin
