On 8/1/2010 10:47 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> 112: override pic_flag at configure time FAILED (pic_flag.at:48) >> >> 112 has been discussed before and should be >> skipped on non-ELF. > > Since I wasn't around, why is this regressing? Is it intermittent? > Maybe a double-check of the testsuite.dir would be nice.
It's not technically a "regression" since AFAIK there was never a time when that particular test actually passed on cygwin/mingw. IIRC, it is a new testsuite addition that was never validated on cygwin/mingw. The fact that the test failed on cygming just wasn't caught until I reported it some months ago, in another context. However, there have always been bigger fish to fry, so nobody has gotten around to making it skip on non-ELF, or figuring out how to translate the test into terms that might make sense on PE/COFF. -- Chuck
