On 06/17/2010 10:35 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On 06/17/2010 10:21 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 6/17/2010 10:24 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Unfortunately, this doesn't magically assist solving my problem with
71. dlloader-api.at:23: FAILED (dlloader-api.at:422)
but that's not a reason to object to the patch.
Well that sucks :(
I suggest changing the LT__SETERROR macro in
libltdl/libltdl/lt__private.h to print __FILE__ and __LINE__ etc. if
errorcode == FILE_NOT_FOUND, then running test 71 again. It doesn't look
like it's happening in loadlibrary.c.
../libtool/libltdl/loaders/preopen.c (188)
../libtool/libltdl/loaders/preopen.c (188)
../libtool/libltdl/loaders/preopen.c (188)
Hmm. Adding more debug output to preopen.c:vm_open ...
Searching for preloaded symbol table for dlopen.a
Err...why is it looking for a module named "/usr/bin/last"? Is it
somehow using a $PATH search, and matching "last" to
"/usr/bin/last.exe"? cygwin's dlopen does do some funky things with
$PATH, because that's how windows looks for DLLs -- but we're in
preopen, here...
Ok, it's adding a loader (at the end of the list of loaders), then
trying to lt_dlopen("last"), that's going to try all other loaders
before getting to the added loader, and in your case the loadlibrary
loader finds /usr/bin/last (because /usr/bin is properly in the search
path).
My changes to lt_dlerror should have given you the error from
loadlibrary.c, but didn't, I will check why, it looks like the patch
needs more work though.
Peter
