Den 2009-12-30 22:22 skrev Bob Friesenhahn:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Peter Rosin wrote:
Aha, you have misunderstood the patch, that's why we don't understand
each other. The patch does indeed allocate a buffer, that's the whole
point of sending the error message to lt_dladderror. The error message
is cached indefinitely inside lt_dladderror. In order to not grow that
In what line of code is a string buffer allocated? The only buffer
allocation I see is a REALLOC to increase the buffer which holds
diagnostic pointers. Then the passed pointer is assigned directly to
the pointer at errindex without any allocation or string copy.
Oh, I knew I was too tired when I wrote that patch. You are of course
correct.
*blush*
Cheers,
Peter
