Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Seems ok. Thanks for persevering.
NP :)
> OK. Well, can we compromise on _also_ having an executability test?
> There are always so many things that can go wrong for execution, that it
> is nonetheless useful to try that out, and for that, to have an
> executable that calls a function from the library.
Absolutely fine by me; I'll code it that way.
cheers,
DaveK
