Peter Rosin wrote:

> I think the new file tests/win32.at has a too generic name. And what if
> some non-win32 platform needs this? I think the test should be named
> tests/bindir.at (or inst-bindir.at) since that is what is tested.

  How about pe-dll.at?

> You also enable the code in ltmain for *cegcc*, but you skip the test.

  Oops, oversight; I'll enable it in the respin, thanks for noticing.

    cheers,
      DaveK



Reply via email to