Peter Rosin wrote: > I think the new file tests/win32.at has a too generic name. And what if > some non-win32 platform needs this? I think the test should be named > tests/bindir.at (or inst-bindir.at) since that is what is tested.
How about pe-dll.at? > You also enable the code in ltmain for *cegcc*, but you skip the test. Oops, oversight; I'll enable it in the respin, thanks for noticing. cheers, DaveK