* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:15:55PM CEST: > The only substantial change is for static builds which currently > don't have a wrapper.
Yes. > The static build is a more significant concern since static builds are > often used for debugging purposes and if we hide the static binary in a > subdirectory, it may be more difficult to debug. Good point, thanks. > We need to make sure > that it is both possible to obtain the necessary run-time environment, > and to run the debugger on the correct binary. Proposals for the > cleanest way to do that are appreciated. Well, did this cease to work (except for the bug which was fixed in 2.2.2)? ./libtool --mode=execute gdb ./prog --args ... Cheers, Ralf
