Hi Alan,
Unfortunately, we’d need a lot more information in this report (and possibly a 
test server) to see what is happening conclusively. I suspect the client 
application, not the library, needs to be updated to handle the waterfall 
behavior of 2FA/keyboard interactive in the same way as OpenSSH for maximum 
capability. In the applications I develop we fully support 2FA but the 
waterfall is fairly complicated to maintain compatibility with OpenSSH.

Cheers,

Will


> On May 20, 2019, at 10:35 AM, Alan Nichols <alan.nich...@ni.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello libssh developers,
>  
> I recently ran into an obscure problem when using libssh2 to interact with an 
> openssh client.  In resolving the issue, the support staff for the client 
> informed me that “libssh2's implementation of keyboard-interactive logins 
> does not work properly when compared to the way openssh client handles 
> keyboard-interactive.”  The support staff implemented a workaround, which 
> they explained to me as follows:
>  
> “In order to implement 2FA (two factor auth), sshd_config was configured to 
> use  publickey and keyboard-interactive
> as the authentication methods with ChallengeRepsonseAuthentication enabled.
> sshd the publickey part, then passes the remaining authentication logic to 
> PAM (keyboard-interactive).
> PAM for sshd is configured to use google-authenticator if it has been 
> configured for the user.
>  
> libssh2 does not properly implement keyboard-interactive which is what was 
> causing your failures.
> To work around this, sshd config was reverted to the original config of using 
> just publickey auth.”
>  
> This is fine with me and everything is working as I’d expect.  However, I may 
> in the future run up against customers who have a similar problem on their 
> own systems and whose admins may be restricted by company policy from making 
> similar changes to the config files.  A better solution would be to have 
> better 2-factor authentication compatibility between libssh2 and openssh. 
>  
> Can you comment on this?  Do you expect this compatibility problem to be 
> resolved in the future and if so, when?
>  
> Many thanks,
>  
> Alan Nichols
> Development Engineer
> AWR Group, National Instruments
> 1017 W. Glen Oaks Lane, Suite 106
> Mequon, WI 53092
> P: 1.262.241.2383
> F: 1.262.240.0294
> E: alan.nich...@ni.com <mailto:alan.nich...@ni.com>
> http://www.ni.com/awr <http://www.ni.com/awr>
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> libssh2-devel https://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel 
> <https://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel>
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel https://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel

Reply via email to