On 27 October 2016 at 13:37, Kamil Dudka <kdu...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thursday, October 27, 2016 11:15:30 Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Why do you prefer running more checks when a failure can't be avoided >> anyway? > > I often debug build issues remotely on distro builders, Travis CI, etc. > It is better for me to know as many problems as possible from a single > build attempt than discovering the problems one by one and having to > wait for the results in each iteration. Ah, batch process vs. interactive.. well, that makes sense. Your earlier suggestion about somehow getting a summary of failures at the end would give the best of both worlds. I'm not sure if I've seen that in practice though - is it something that is reasonably easy to set up with autoconf? I still haven't acquired much understanding of autoconf, after all this years of fiddling with it. _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel https://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
