I see all mentor evaluation being filled. So this should be ok by now. F.
On 26/06/14 16:14, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Cedric, Hi Fridrich, > > melange is crapping out on me. Neither my bjoern.michael...@gmail.com nor my > bjoern.michael...@canonical.com account lets me take any action/evaluation. As > mst (co-mentor) is on vacation too and possibly hasnt filed this, please > handle > this for me. Thanks. > > Best, > > Bjoern > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:06:30AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: >> The mid-term evaluations are just now! So, head to Google Melange and >> submit them before Friday. In case you really can't fill the evaluation >> your self, ask either your co-mentor or one of your beloved admins >> (Fridrich, Thorsten or myself) to do it. >> >> Below are the questions of the form. >> >>> 1. How many years have you been a mentor for Google Summer of >>> Code (Total - this doesn’t have to be consecutive)? >>> >>> 1. This is my first year >>> >>> 2. 2-3 years > 2. 2-3 years >>> >>> 3. More than 3 years >>> >>> 2. If you answered “2-3 years” or “more than 3 years” as a >>> mentor, what years did you participate? >>> >>> 3. How many years have you been a student in Google Summer of >>> Code? >>> >>> 1. I have never been a student > 1. I have never been a student >>> >>> 2. 1 year >>> >>> 3. 2 years >>> >>> 4. 3+ years >>> >>> 4. If you answered 2 years or 3+ years, what years did you >>> participate as a student? >>> >>> 5. At what point did you first make contact with your student? >>> >>> 1. Before the program was announced >>> >>> 2. After my organization was selected to participate in >>> Google Summer of Code >>> >>> 3. During the student application/acceptance phase of the >>> program > 3. During the student application/acceptance phase of the > program >>> >>> 4. During the community bonding period >>> >>> 5. After the start of coding >>> >>> 6. How often do you and your student interact? >>> >>> 1. Daily >>> >>> 2. Every few days >>> >>> 3. Weekly >>> >>> 4. Every few weeks > 4. Every few weeks >>> >>> 5. Monthly >>> >>> 6. Less than once a month >>> >>> 7. How do you communicate with your student? (Check all that >>> apply) >>> >>> 1. Google+ Hangout >>> >>> 2. Voice (phone, Skype, etc.) >>> >>> 3. IM/IRC > 3. IM/IRC >>> >>> 4. Private emails >>> >>> 5. Mailing Lists > 5. Mailing Lists >>> >>> 6. Student blog updates >>> >>> 7. In-person meeting(s) >>> >>> 8. Other >>> >>> 8. Of the communication methods listed above, which do you use >>> most frequently? > IRC >>> >>> 9. How much time do you spend on Google Summer of Code per week >>> (take into consideration your interactions with your student >>> as well as time working with your org and on your own)? >>> >>> 1. 1-5 hours > 1. 1-5 hours >>> >>> 2. 5-10 hours >>> >>> 3. 10-15 hours >>> >>> 4. 15-20 hours >>> >>> 5. More than 20 hours per week >>> >>> 10. How many time zones apart from your student are you? >>> >>> 1. Less than 3 >>> >>> 2. 3-6 >>> >>> 3. More than 6 >>> >>> 11. How often do you require status updates from your student? >>> >>> 1. Daily >>> >>> 2. Every few days >>> >>> 3. Weekly > 3. Weekly >>> >>> 4. Only when explicitly asked for by me >>> >>> 12. Please rate the quality of your interactions and >>> communications with the student (consider his/her >>> communication with you as well as your responses). >>> >>> 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the >>> quality of communication is high) > 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the > quality of communication is high) >>> >>> 2. Good (Student is somewhat responsive and the quality >>> of communication is okay) >>> >>> 3. Bad (Student is only somewhat or not at all responsive >>> and the quality of communication is low) >>> >>> 13. Please rate the quality of the student’s interactions with >>> your organization and community. >>> >>> 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the >>> quality of communication is high) > 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the > quality of communication is high) >>> >>> 2. Good (Student is somewhat responsive and the quality >>> of communication is okay) >>> >>> 3. Bad (Student is only somewhat or not at all responsive >>> and the quality of communication is low) >>> >>> 14. Is your student on track to complete his/her project? >>> >>> 1. The student has already completed his/her project >>> >>> 2. He/she is ahead of schedule >>> >>> 3. He/she is on schedule > 3. He/she is on schedule >>> >>> 4. He/she is behind schedule >>> >>> 15. Please rate the quality of code/work the student has produced >>> thus far. >>> >>> 1. Amongst the best people I’ve ever worked with >>> >>> 2. Solid-quality performance > 2. Solid-quality performance >>> >>> 3. Good performance >>> >>> 4. Mediocre performance >>> >>> 5. Disappointing or not performing at all >>> >>> 16. Give an example of a very good or very bad interaction you had >>> with your student. > > Student proactively posts regular status updates to the project mailing list > that give a good overview of ongoing development while still being concise. >>> >>> 17. Anything else you’d like to tell us or suggestions on how we >>> could improve the program? >>> >>> 18. For the midterm evaluation, should this student pass or fail? >>> >>> 1. Pass > 1. Pass >>> >>> 2. Fail >>> >>> 19. If you chose “fail” above, please fill in the reason for >>> failure. >> >> -- >> Cedric >> _______________________________________________ >> LibreOffice mailing list >> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
