On 10/06/14 11:04, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > In the long run we might add our local patches to the native make again, if > its > worth it (maybe?), but that can be done incrementally. Also incrementally, we
maybe they would provide some additional speedup, although i never liked the built-in cp patch much :) well the most important thing for now is that other people can successfully build with native Win32 make, so we can switch. > might reduce our dependency on cygwin in general (you are still using it as a > POSIX environment, are you?) and slowly move to use/be able to use something > smaller and selfcontained[1] like GnuWin32 or even busybox. Apart from > possibly > simplifying build env setup, its always good to have the build system not to > depend too hard on one implementation (cygwin). perhaps using a native Win32 shell would provide some additional speed-up over Cygwin's bash... as long as it doesn't require another significant tweak to the quoting in the commands... _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
