Lionel Elie Mamane wrote > It would seem to me that indeed the "ownDeletesAreVisible" is > wrong. OTOH, it was "==" and it was changed in (by Ocke Janssen, not > Olivier > Bolte, who as far as I understand has done the merge): > ... > So I would like to be cautious there. I cannot find any definite > source whether "ownDeletesAreVisible" means "the deleted rows are > still visible" or "the delete action is visible -> the deleted rows > are not visible". If we can find some good documentation or example > from another JDBC driver...
I found a French link (but it's not official), http://blog.paumard.org/cours/jdbc/chap05-resultset-types.html " On peut tester si notre ResultSet voit ses propres suppressions ou pas, par appel à la méthode DatabaseMetaData.ownDeletesAreVisible(int type). Si elles le sont, alors la méthode rowDeleted() retourne true si la ligne a été effacée, false sinon.... Il est important de savoir si un ResultSet est sensible ou non aux lignes que l'on efface dedans, car dans certaines implémentations, les lignes effacées ne sont pas retirées, mais remplacées par des lignes vides. " quick and dirty translation: "We can test if our resultset sees its own deletes or not, when calling DatabaseMetaData.ownDeletesAreVisible(int type). If deletes are visible, so the RowDeleted() method returns "true" if the row has been removed, false otherwise. .. It's important to know if a Resultset takes into account the rows deleted in it, because in some implementations, the deleted rows are not removed but replaced by empty rows. " Julien -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/About-parts-in-ODatabaseMetaData-cxx-connectivy-module-odbc-part-tp4104005p4104183.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
