Dear Bert, I am glad of it. Yes, it is not a bug. Thanks for the feedback.
Best regards, László 2014-03-24 15:57 GMT+01:00 Bert Frees <bertfr...@gmail.com>: > Dear László, > > Thanks for your answer. You are right, substrings.pl turns out to be exactly > what I need. > > So I guess this is not a bug. I missed the section about the substrings > script in the README, although it is made obvious enough with warnings etc. > :) > > Cheers, > Bert > > > 2014-03-24 15:19 GMT+01:00 Németh László <nem...@numbertext.org>: > >> Dear Bert, >> >> It seems for me, that your hyphenation patterns haven't been processed >> by the substrings.pl script of libhyphen distribution. Could you check >> it? >> >> Thanks for your bug report, >> >> Best regards, >> László >> >> 2014-03-24 14:44 GMT+01:00 Bert Frees <bertfr...@gmail.com>: >> > Dear László and others, >> > >> > We think we may have found a bug in libhyphen. It could be that it is >> > just a >> > limitation of the algorithm, but anyway it's an issue for us. >> > >> > The problem is that some patterns in a dictionary are ignored in some >> > cases, >> > namely when the match string of that pattern is a part of the match >> > string >> > of another pattern, and more specifically when it's not just a prefix. >> > >> > Let me clarify that with an example. When a dictionary consists of these >> > two >> > patterns, the word `foobar' is not hyphenated because the first pattern >> > is >> > ignored: >> > >> > oo1b >> > foob >> > >> > The second, longer pattern doesn't even have to match, as the second >> > example >> > shows (the first pattern is still ignored): >> > >> > oo1b >> > foobz >> > >> > I have a patch that solves part of the problem: >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/bertfrees/libhyphen-nar/blob/adc2b74a19469e4dc93777fcdb82e36e566a0472/src/patches/bug.patch >> > >> > With this patch the given examples will be handled correctly, but in >> > other >> > situations it will still fail, such as here: >> > >> > oo1b >> > foobaz >> > >> > Have I indeed found a bug here, and does my patch make sense, or am I >> > just >> > expecting too much and are we hitting the limits of the algorithm? >> > >> > Thanks for considering, >> > Bert Frees > > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
