Similarly, there's CID#708952 (see https://scan5.coverity.com:8443/reports.htm#v22002/p10276/fileInstanceId=47973599&defectInstanceId=14481123&mergedDefectId=708952). Here, there's no consequence, since there's no specific destructor in SfxListUndoAction. But if there's one in the future, it won't be taken into account since destructor of SfxUndoArray isn't virtual (see http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/svl/undo.hxx#136)
-- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-scan-coverity-708945-non-virtual-destructor-in-parent-class-tp4087082p4087118.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
