On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:43 AM, jonathon <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/07/2013 07:20 PM, Bryan Quigley wrote: > >> 1. Remove all of the "OpenOffice.org 1.0" file formats. >> More importantly I don't see any use case for this file format anymore. Is >> anyone still exporting to it / or know anyone who is? > > Legacy documents: The organization might not use the specific file > format anymore, but they do have them in their archives. > > That said, if there is a _maintained_ user installable extension that > enables LibO to read/write/edit those file formats, then eliminating > them from the standard lineup should be acceptable to all. > > Caveat: Once upon a time, one of the features was that support for > legacy documents was built in. By migrating file format input/output to > extensions, third parties might not accept that legacy file formats are > still supported. > >> 2. Change one of these names to be consistent: >> Either: OpenDocument Text (odt) or Flat ODF Text Document (fodt) > > Two different document types.
yes... but the issue is the inconsistent naming OpenDocument for one and ODF for the other... when the only difference is Flat or not-flat Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
