On 10/10/2013 04:12 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 10/10/13 09:14, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
....which brings me back to my original question for a universal trigger
whether or not to produce installation sets during a build.
Seeing that --enable-epm currently effectively fulfills that role
everywhere but on Windows, one option would be to make it fulfill that
role on Windows too. (I have a local patch to do that.)
The alternative would be to introduce an explicit
--enable-installation-sets. Opinions, anyone?
we already have --with-package-format, much simpler to do nothing if the
user doesn't specify that than adding another option, or using
--enable-epm on a plaform where EPM is irrelevant.
Yes, sounds better to tweak --with-package-format into that role than to
stretch --enable-epm.
So, if there are no complaints coming, I'll change the meaning of
--with-package-format so that only if --with-package-format=... is
explicitly specified are installation sets (of the specified kinds)
generated.
Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
