On 30/08/13 11:11, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > ...because boost::noncopyable has become the de-facto standard idiom for > this, at least for pre-C++11 code that depends on Boost anyway. > [citation missing]
Sure, nice to have standard idiom that causes us to have to work-around implementation bugs. Where two private declarations could be enough. But then maybe I am too low-level for the modern C++ developers. I even know how to manage my memory myself :) F. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
