On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:40:03PM +0200, Miklos Vajna <vmik...@suse.cz> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 04:34:02PM +0100, Michael Meeks > <michael.me...@suse.com> wrote: > > AI: + write a trivial example for paragraph properties (Miklos) > > Done:
As Michael Stahl mentioned on IRC, it turns out we already have something similar for ODF: RES_UNKNOWNATR_CONTAINER in sw, its uno api is xml::ParaUserDefinedAttributesSupplier. Given that it serves a different purpose (we don't want to write back those OOXML properties to ODF, nor the other way around), having different UNO properties make sense, but it would be wise to check if the underlying SfxPoolItem (SvXMLAttrContainerItem) could be reused, instead of the newly introduced SfxGrabBagItem. SfxGrabBagItem is a string-any map, while SvXMLAttrContainerItem is a string-string map (with some additional namespace support, but you can ignore that). If it's confirmed that such a grab bag container doesn't have to support nesting, then reusing is possible, I think. But I'm not sure that's the case, seeing that in case of normal UNO properties, both structures and simple values are used as a property value. Opinions?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
