Thanks Norbert, 1) Regardless of timing, I believe it still needs to be reversed (although since this should be an easy reverse, I hope with help it can be reversed soon).
2) I am not sure what makes something qualify for backport, but if this is needed, is there anything I need to do? 3) I am also involved in the development of the ICU break iterator for ICU and I know it has not been fixed (nor will it be any time soon and possibly never - even the Thai break-iterator is not 100% accurate). If any more information is needed from anyone, please let me know if I can clarify anything to help get this reversed. Thanks for your time, Nathan On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Nathan Wells <sungk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Some time ago I requested a patch to enable the ICU breakiterator for > Khmer > > to be used in LibreOffice and spellchecking. > > > > But because of some additional issues that have yet to be resolved, I now > > would like to request that the patch for Khmer be reverse for the > time-being > > until some other issues are resolved (59448 and 59447). > > > > Would someone be willing to help and reverse the patch? Here is the > > original bug submission: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52020 > > Nathan, > > Technically it would not be too hard to reverse, but > 1/ that reverse would not make it in time for 4.1 > 2/ It is unclear to me that such a change would qualify for a backport > to stable branch > 3/ the current master has a newer version of ICU... maybe that > particular issue of icu have been solved upstream (in icu)? > > Norbert >
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
