Context:
fdo#63695 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63695
i#51621 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=51621
The fix for i#51621 (commit bdf02613) causes fdo#63695. The comment
added says:
// don't call the activation handler if we don't have any slots we can
serve
// The activation handler is used to put the shell on the top of the
dispatcher stack,
// so it's preferred when slots are distributed.
// Note that this is a slight hack, to prevent that we grab slots from
the SfxDispatcher
// which should be served by other shells (e.g. Cut/Copy/Paste).
// A real solution would be a forwarding-mechanism for slots: We should
be on the top
// if we're active, but if we cannot handle the slot, then we need to
tell the dispatcher
// to skip our shell, and pass the slot to the next one. However, this
mechanism is not
// not in place in SFX.
// Another possibility would be to have dedicated shells for the slots
which we might
// or might not be able to serve. However, this could probably increase
the number of
// shells too much (In theory, nearly every slot could have an own
shell then).
//
// #i51621# / 2005-08-19 / frank.schoenh...@sun.com
Maybe sfx2 by now has "this mechanism in place"? If yes, I'd
appreciate some help in making use of it so that "it works".
--
Lionel
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
