On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 10:19 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> I tried that on a sample repo, so thanks for bringing this up. It seems
> the git rename detection is O(N^2), so the default number of renamed
> files is limited to avoid long merges.
Presumably it would be possible to cache rename information trawled
from the history at great cost, so a second time a cherry-pick is done,
things are much harder ? (at least locally that is).
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
