Hi Michael,
Il 18/03/2013 16:21, Michael Meeks ha scritto:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 14:41 +0100, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
The standard practice is to use just a plain file with the pid inside,
other tools won't parse an ini file just to find the pid.
Seems unlikely to cause any real harm to me :-)
Out of interest, did you see the liblibreoffice work that's Jack and I
started ? cf. smoketest/libtest.cxx and desktop/inc etc. I'd love to
move the current headless uses of libreoffice further up the stack, such
that the forking / managing of helper processes can be done in native
code, and (ultimately) pushed back down into LibreOffice as much as
possible.
I didn't see that, thanks for sharing. Note to self: the interesting
bits are in desktop/source/lib/init.cxx
Of course, liblibreoffice still suffers from several problems -
bootstrapping nasties and so on ;-) but the basic idea is to allow a
faster, smaller headless experience and re-use of the filter logic;
alongside a dependency-free ~entirely virtual shared library.
A longer way to go there though of course; help appreciated.
The idea is indeed sound, also it looks like that an hypothetical
libreoffice daemon can be implemented in a sensible number of lines :)
thanks,
riccardo
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
