Time Begin: 1405
Present: Florian, Joel, Joren, Petr, Robinson
Pending Action Items
*NEEDINFO
+AGREED: Current text is good for 1st comment to be added to all
NEEDINFO bugs which have not had activity for 6+ months.
+AGREED: This week we will start process
+ACTION: Joel will be responsible for mass bug changes this round,
he will do test with ~20 bugs to make sure system works, then move
forward with the rest of them
-Will email developer list to let developers know the data/time
that change will occur
-AGREED: Temporary whiteboard status to monitor bugs that are
mass commented on
*Bug Submission Assistant (Localized French)
+Update from Rob is that most technical work is done, some minor
translation is ongoing from Sophie
*Realistic Goals
+New wiki page discussed in “NEW ACTION ITEMS”
+https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Projects
*Funding Wishlist
+Need update from Bjoern about status of netbooks
-If netbooks are approved: ACTION: Joel will write up proposal
for how we go about determining if someone is eligible to get one
*Triage Contest
+AGREED: Timeline looks good, plan to do contest June 20th – July 5th
+Any notes about rules can be sent to Joel via email
+ACTION: Joel will work on rough draft of rules over the next few
weeks
+Ideas for prizes
-Hoodies, T-Shirts, Mug, laptop case
*Wiki Pages
+Joren has merged and cleaned QA-Team page
- https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/QA_Team
New Action Items
*FDO
+Prioritized Bugs
-AGREE: Somehow being able to determine what bugs have been
prioritized by QA is a good thing
-A lot of discussion about using QA field or new whiteboard
status – pros and cons discussed
-Lead to discussion about what QA contact means, some
disagreement and acknowledging pros/cons of different ideas
-AGREED: Move conversation back to mailing list to try to find
best solution, aim to have final vote next meeting.
-ACTION: Joel will start thread back up from Rainer's previous
thread.
+Verified – WORKSFORME
-AGREED: Makes a lot of sense to have this, original reporter
can confirm that a bug indeed WFM by setting status to VERIFIED –
WORKSFORME
-AGREED: If QA member sets bug to WFM they should leave a
comment explaining that if reporter can verify to change status, if they
cannot, to reopen as UNCONFIRMED
+Signature
-Using signature could be good if it invites users to
contribute to LibreOffice through multiple avenues such as QA,
marketing, developing, and explains that run by a team of volunteers.
Also a pointer to good bug reporting (reproducible steps, good
prioritizing)
*Wiki
+New wiki page to track QA projects
- https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Projects
-Everyone welcometo add projects, idea is that if someone
leaves QA, their projects will continue for others to work on
+Team Page
- https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/QA_Team
-Everyone who wishes to be included in “QA Team” should add
name to this list
End Time: 1510
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
