Hey,
> Cppcheck reported this: > [reportdesign/source/filter/xml/xmlComponent.hxx:37]: (style) > 'OXMLComponent::operator=' should return 'OXMLComponent &'. > [reportdesign/source/filter/xml/xmlFunction.hxx:41]: (style) > 'OXMLFunction::operator=' should return 'OXMLFunction &'. > [reportdesign/source/filter/xml/xmlGroup.hxx:38]: (style) > 'OXMLGroup::operator=' should return 'OXMLGroup &'. > [reportdesign/source/filter/xml/xmlCell.hxx:41]: (style) > 'OXMLCell::operator=' should return 'OXMLCell &'. > > By trying to fix these, I noticed that none of them was implemented. So can > they just be removed, is it another C++ "trick", or something obvious I > missed? > You can't remove them. They are declared there to prevent the default operator= and copy c'tor. If you don't declare them private and leave out the implementation the compiler will generate a default operator= (the same is true for the copy c'tor). But you can of course change the signature of the operator even when it does not matter in that case as these will not be implemented. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
