On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com>wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 01:00 PM, Lior Kaplan wrote: > >> I'd like to raise the question why do we need the full SHA1 for as the >> build ID? >> (See >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/**libreoffice/core/commit/?id=** >> b7e6c8459b15a4fdb9ebb269b27cde**ea82c8c5c2<http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=b7e6c8459b15a4fdb9ebb269b27cdeea82c8c5c2> >> ) >> >> Using the abbreviated version looks weird enough for users, and I think >> the full version won't add anything. >> Technically they are the same (correct me if I'm wrong). >> > > The abbreviated form is much more prone for collision than the > unabbreviated one, and the core git repo indeed already has at least one > collision of abbreviated SHA1s. Try "git show 349fa28a". > Thanks, although I couldn't find the other commit (the first is 349fa28a5998d10b110da1a7fcc6b5b24d5940b1) Kaplan
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
