Hi, On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:57:48AM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Saturday 13 of October 2012, oger000 wrote: > > Preface: I am a novice in many things. > > > > To get familiar with the stringclasses I chose the "rtl namespace prefix > > removal" because I have seen some patches of this kind on the mailinglist. > > > > My questions: > > > > 1) I did not find background info - at least not at > > <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/String_Classes> why the > > removing of the "rtl::" namespace prefix is preferable. > > > > Any pointers? - or is it more a cosmetic cleanup? > > Yes, it is more of a cosmetic cleanup - the classes are already in practice > namespaced by the O prefix and so not explicitly adding the rtl:: prefix is > avoiding the nuisance of the extra writing and also, since these are very > commonly uses classes, makes the code more readable.
Well, I do not agree with this, but I do not really care, except one thing: could we at least change _all_ public headers at once, please? Recompilation of half of the project because of a meaningless change in some module's headers is a bother. D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
