Hi, On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:05:48AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:01:36AM +0200, David Tardon <dtar...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > If a source file really contained only unused functions, it would likely > > have been found (and removed) with the help of callcatcher. Of course, > > that would not help if the source were not compiled at all (and we found > > such files on several occasions in the past)... I wonder if it would be > > possible to construct a (more or less) complete list of used source tree > > files from make dependencies; something that could be scripted and run > > periodically to ensure we are not accumulating unused cruft... > > Not so easy, I think -- all OSX/Win-specific files are unused in a Linux > build, for example...
That is why I wrote "possible", not "easy" .-) Also, callcatcher has the same problem and yet we use it. D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
