On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:06 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/22/2012 03:50 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 09:48 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > >>> Nominated the fdo#53474 as a most annoying for 3.6. It is a regression > >>> from > >>> 3.5 and has been with us now for four build/QA reviews. > >>> > >>> Not sure of the etiquette but are you willing to take assignment of the > >>> bug? > >> > >> Provisionally, on the condition that the patch really fixes the problem > >> > >> I guess that would not be a problem (except to actually round someone to > >> review the patch, because nearly everyone is at the conference). > > > > So - the patch looks rather sensible to me; I've back-ported it to -3-6 > > to avoid the win32 build issues it can't really hurt I think; it'd be > > great to have a confirmation that it helps though :-) > > > > I'd be happy to have that in -3-6-3 too if we can; anyone else want to > > give a +1 to: > > > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-6&id=b3a49f990273c9fa6e2b90245c271a14b38280f0 > > You have my +1, but I'm not sure the fix actually helps on Windows, > where JNIEXPORT likely expands to the same as SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT > (namely __declspec(dllexport)), anyway.
Let's give it a try. It should not harm => pushed into 3-6-3. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
