On 03/10/12 19:33, Libreoffice Gerrit user wrote:
>  expat/expat-2.1.0.patch           |   90 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fontconfig/fontconfig-2.8.0.patch |   20 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
> 
> New commits:
> commit 78c7bbc3ce92493ca98c605f92733e31ad87ef70
> Author: Tor Lillqvist <t...@iki.fi>
> Date:   Wed Oct 3 15:21:15 2012 +0300
> 
>     Use different symbol names in the two expat variants we build
>     
>     We need to be able to link both into one binary in the
>     disable-dynloading case.

this is crazy.  what is the point of building the UTF-16 variant anyway?
 i never understood that.  why not build just the UTF-8 variant, at
least for the weird platforms that don't have working dynamic libraries?

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to