On 10/02/2012 04:22 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
Part of my motivation for adding this, besides making String->OUString conversion easier, was that OUString already has the operator+= methods.
Yes, but OUStringBuffer only has append() until now, and---as Michael already pointed out---some append() overloads take multiple parameters, so cannot map naturally to operator+=. So I see more value in keeping the append() vs. operator+= difference between OUStringBuffer and OUString, than in removing that difference but instead introducing differences between what OUStringBuffer::append() supports vs. what any new OUStringBuffer::operator+= would support.
Stephan _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
