What about adding some kind of whiteboard status (I know....more....not good), that is like "verified and prioritized by a member of QA", then in the future when we're cleaning the NEW bugs and prioritizing them we know when an experienced user has already done the triaging (vs. the user just trying to get us to look at their minor bug faster).
Best Regards, Joel On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@suse.com>wrote: > Hi Joel, > > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 08:56 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > > I know that this is a touchy subject and needs a lot of discussion > > but, how difficult is it to make it so you need permissions to change > > priority and severity of a bug? My goal is to at least "kind of" deal > > with priorities in the coming months but it's pretty much impossible > > if a regular user can go in and set a bug as CRITICAL - HIGHEST > > because of a minor alignment issue -- and this is pretty common. > > Heh ;+) in that case they need a support contract clearly ;-) > > > I think we should start discussing if it's time to close off certain > > things in FDO to regular users and start talking about who gets > > permissions to do these. > > My suspicion is that the other freedesktop projects would hate > that, > and that this is something that we'd need to share with them; making it > rather difficult to fix. > > Hence the most-annoying tracker for 'blockers' and so on - I guess > we > could introduce other trackers for important-but-not-MAB type things > but ... there are clearly diminishing returns in interest from very long > lists. > > ATB, > > Michael. > > -- > michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot > >
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
