Le Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:44:28 +0200, Jan Holesovsky <ke...@suse.cz> a écrit:
Hi Mat,

Mat M píše v St 05. 09. 2012 v 23:25 +0200:
But is it normal that ccache on 3.6 branch only uses 3Gb ? I find it very
low, compared to all binary files produced.

Could someone on linux give its ccache stats to compare ?
Kendy, what's your opinion ?

I think the best would be to check the content of your ccache dir, and
see if there are new files appearing there.  You can also look at the
content of the new files, if they look ~reasonably - IIRC I cache even
the stdout/stderr for the dependency output.

I don't have any starts at hand at the moment, but should you need any
more details, please let me know :-)


I think we can close this.
I thought it should be higher because I remembered someone talking about 32 Gb needed, but I think now it was because of debug builds & history.
So my 3Gb are fine and big enough, that's ok.
I don't know if it is related, but workdir is 4,4 Gb for a standard windows build

Thank you all for your answers


--
Mat M
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to