Hi, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:47:37PM +0200, John Smith wrote: > Well at the moment there may not be a lot of testcases. But I get the > impression that the whole reason for adding test coverage in the 1st > place, is that (much) more tests are intended to be added in the > future for covering the code that isnt tested yet ? And if that is the > case, wouldnt it make more sense to cleanly separate 'building your > project' and 'testing your project' ? I dont get the impression that > everyone that compiles the code will be interested in all checks being > executed, especially once there are more tests. For the future, it > might make more sense if 'make build' (or something similar) only > compiles the code without running the tests, and that the tests only > get executed if 'make check' is run ?
We already have enough separation there: unittests, slowtests and subsequentchecks are all triggered as needed and when it makes sense. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
