Hi Nico,
So - firstly, thanks for your work - it's great to have an improved
structure for the autocompletion data; as you say there are a number of
nasty performance problems & self-inflicted wounds there.
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 00:39 +0000, Nico Weyand wrote:
> Well, in that case, I'm officially stating that the code I've
> committed (and all future code I am going to commit) may be used under
> LGPLv3+ (If I've understood it correctly, only one of both the
> licenses you named is required and I do prefer LGPL over MPL).
We require a dual license: MPL/LGPLv3+ statement. We understand if you
don't want to make that, but then including this one change has a big
impact on the licensing of our code base.
The ideal is to get a clean blanket statement (as above) and link you
into:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
Thanks !
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
