On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 09:11 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Right; that's so. Of course, in some languages eg. C# you can bind to
> > that with a delegate requiring no function definition ;-)
>
> I wonder what you mean C# can do what at least C++11 can not: With it you
> easily bind member functions (and also lambdas).
Sorry pardon, I mean C# which exists in a standardised and deployed
form for many years can do this easily; whereas C++11 which is a living
nightmare for cross-platform developers - also allows it ;->
But yes - having an 'event' IDL construct, and pleasant bindings that
will allow lambdas to be used as well as/when we can use C++11 would be
really extremely pleasant :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
