Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke wrote: > I don't think there is a misunderstanding of this change's purpose, > introduced first with https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/116384 > with the description [...] > I think there's a misunderstanding, that this change would somehow be bad, or incompatible with FOSS, or not appropriate for the core code base.
If you can make it, would be great to talk this through interactively, on Thursday during ESC. Alternatively, as suggested in the patch, please send the ESC your rationale, why this patch should go in (despite the feedback you've already received). Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
