On 06/25/2012 03:57 PM, Philipp Riemer wrote:
Perhaps we could adopt a transitional scheme, where we move our types and
definitions to a new namespace, but leave aliases in the current namespace?
i.e. in pseudo-code:

  namespace shiny
  {
     class Reference ..... yada yada.....
  }
  namespace com.sun.star.uno
  {
      typedef ::shiny::Reference Reference;
  }

Does that sound reasonable (have no real idea, given my lack of C++
experience).

Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that exact step was proposed and
also rejected after discussion a few weeks ago.

With C++03, doesn't work for templates like Reference, anyway.

Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to