On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote: > > If you commit to a local bibisect repo, and then push to a central one: > - you dont need sha1/rsync whatever because git itself makes sure your data > gets transmitted correctly > - you will save bandwidth as the delta between too installs is much smaller > than a full install. And git stores the zipped delta. > > No need to reinvent the wheel: Using git for transmission and compreesion is > already likely a lot better than any custom tooling anyway.
Oh, okay, thanks. I've gotten burned in the past when trying to push a lot of binary data around in git repos, because AFAIK git still can't resume like rsync. I guess the deltas will be small enough that this shouldn't be a problem. I'll see about making the code spam someone if the git operations have a hiccup. I'll set up a machine as a buildbot so that I can test my changes. Anything I should know that's not in the README or the Tinderbox pages on the wiki? --R _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
