On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 15:36 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > I am really hesitant to support just having so many bugs floating > around like this. I think that marking as RESOLVED -> WONTFIX enables > devs to look at these if they are ever inclined to do so but makes it > clear to the users that we won't be doing this.
Yup, I agree totally. Its not helpful to have loads of no-hoper bugs floating around. They should be closed with resolved->wontfix. My suggestion is only around the comment and criteria to use when closing them. e.g. here's our fedora-16 one http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora16#Comment_Text_2 So taking the fedora comment and adjusting it for us, it would look like... " LibreOffice ''(major-version}'' changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on ''(date here)''. LibreOffice ''(major-version}'' is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of LibreOffice please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. " so for us that would mean anything reported against 3.3.X and 3.4.X is up for mass-closing with the above. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
