sw/qa/extras/tiledrendering/tiledrendering.cxx | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 65ff27c32a747ba20837f8453c18456423f4b474
Author: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelm...@gelma.net>
AuthorDate: Thu Oct 5 21:30:27 2023 +0200
Commit: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
CommitDate: Fri Oct 6 10:03:53 2023 +0200
Fix typo
Change-Id: I0b4c80e1e2b625e60d80ae4ae10a43477250176f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/157606
Tested-by: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr>
diff --git a/sw/qa/extras/tiledrendering/tiledrendering.cxx
b/sw/qa/extras/tiledrendering/tiledrendering.cxx
index b3b6c948d884..57d146edee3e 100644
--- a/sw/qa/extras/tiledrendering/tiledrendering.cxx
+++ b/sw/qa/extras/tiledrendering/tiledrendering.cxx
@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(SwTiledRenderingTest,
testUndoReorderingMulti)
// Then make sure view 1's undo action is invoked, out of order:
// Without the accompanying fix in place, this test would have failed with:
// - Expression: pTextNode1->GetText().isEmpty()
- // i.e. out of order undo was not executed, the first paragrph was still
"a".
+ // i.e. out of order undo was not executed, the first paragraph was still
"a".
CPPUNIT_ASSERT(pTextNode1->GetText().isEmpty());
// The top 2 undo actions are not invoked, as they belong to view 2.
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(OUString("yx"), pTextNode2->GetText());
